Label Fail

April 29th, 2008

Thanks to James for:

Culver's Sign Fail
For Sale Fail
Wrong Utensil (Grocery Store Sample Fail...
Perverted Fail?
Fox News Does It Again
Pink Floyd Fail
Food Fail
Jewelry Fail
Fruitland Fail
Double Fail
No way am I buying this sheet...
Sweet "more sour" Chicken... F...
Washroom Fail
Name Fail

14 Responses to Label Fail

  1. stuffgirlslike on April 29th, 2008 at 8:30 am

    it is funny, but might make sense if greyhounds have priority seats.

  2. Copernicus_27 on April 29th, 2008 at 9:39 am

    Stuffgirlslike Comment FAIL!!! Commented on wrong photo.

  3. Hey on April 29th, 2008 at 10:36 pm

    Notice it says PRORITY seating (not priority seating)

  4. Hey on April 29th, 2008 at 10:51 pm

    I totally didn’t comment that on this photo. I think this site fails :(

  5. Joe on April 29th, 2008 at 11:38 pm

    I love hoe people can’t read and keep commenting on the wrong photos.

    Also, necessary abbreviation due to lack of space is not a fail unless the abbreviation inadvertently spells out something else.

    Sorry!

  6. Joe on April 29th, 2008 at 11:38 pm

    How* oops!

  7. Dan on May 1st, 2008 at 10:05 pm

    This one’s not a failure!

  8. Lea on May 2nd, 2008 at 4:55 pm

    the only failure here, is the people not paying attention to the ‘comment’ button for the right picture!

  9. Anonymous on May 2nd, 2008 at 6:08 pm

    I think the problem is the date. It states May 02, 0. Froz may be a problem too.

  10. Becky on May 2nd, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    This is not a fail, the machine that prints the labels is only allotted a certain number of characters. If you looked this up in their system the item would read “Previously frozen” I’m sure.

  11. umm on May 3rd, 2008 at 1:11 pm

    umm everyone is retrded, there is nothing wrong with this pic.

  12. Tracy on May 3rd, 2008 at 4:27 pm

    While Froz is not a fail, the date is. Also, notice how the person before me said “everyone is retrded”. Fail.

  13. Anonymous on May 4th, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    This reply is in defense of the people who commented on the wrong picture. It’s a little obvious after reading what Hey said that the site was messing up. It’s wise not to criticize people before you understand. It makes you sound stupid. Especially if you comment after them.

  14. Who on October 3rd, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    Still not a fail, the date looks like that due to space constraints. Thanks to the nature of the product one can safely assume that it’s May 2nd of whatever year the picture was taken in. Or maybe we just like being nitpicky when printers have limited space.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.