I saw that elsewhere, and I’ll quote what someone had commented:
No no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no
…and then her babies grew up and had even more little babies with her daddy too. They all lived happily together, until the fascist government arrested daddy and put all the little babies in foster homes. The End.
I’m actually kind of surprised they didn’t misspell “babies”, too.
But yeah, WTF kind of book did this come from!? I’m not usually a proponent of censorship, but I don’t think anyone should buy or read this if it’s a real book!
Sick!! That can’t be real. It has to be photoshopped. Some sicko just thought it would be funny to photoshop that text in, right? Right? Please tell me I’m right…
Seems to me that the writing style suggests that the book itself was written by a young child, whose current understanding of the world is “When little girls grow up, they turn into mommies who are married to daddies” or whatever.
That is the only way that I can make sense of this tragedy.
At first, I was shocked at the idea of this being in a children’s book; then I realized that this is probably from a work of confrontational art. This would not seem out-of-place in an art gallery; and as art which addresses gender-roles, this is brilliant. I believe more research into the source of this image is needed as I think it has been taken out of context.
I saw that elsewhere, and I’ll quote what someone had commented:
No no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no
I agree.
Is this how they are teaching sex-ed in schools now?
Hall Monitor
http://detentionslip.org
…say what now?
I’ll be her daddy. Wait. What?
Epic Squick!
The rest of the book is that creepy.
You’ve seen the rest of it!? o.O
What’s its title!? Is it serious!?
…and then her babies grew up and had even more little babies with her daddy too. They all lived happily together, until the fascist government arrested daddy and put all the little babies in foster homes. The End.
Because it’s this blog, I noticed that “Daddies” was spelled wrong before I noticed that the book was promoting creepy father/daughter incest.
Is this for real? Or is this some sicko’s photoshop project?
I’m actually kind of surprised they didn’t misspell “babies”, too.
But yeah, WTF kind of book did this come from!? I’m not usually a proponent of censorship, but I don’t think anyone should buy or read this if it’s a real book!
Oh noes! Babies having babies! With their daddyes!
Knock Knock!
Who’s there?
WRONG!
Uhm.
What the shit? O_o
400 BABIES … that run faster than KENYANS!
Mother nature will be like “sloooooooooooooow doooooooooowwwwwn!”
Sick!! That can’t be real. It has to be photoshopped. Some sicko just thought it would be funny to photoshop that text in, right? Right? Please tell me I’m right…
Ew!
Agreed!
O.K.I just threw up a little in my mouth.
God, who wrote this? Freud?
Aw, what the hell, man. That’s fucked up.
Is that the beginning or the end of the story? I need to know….
This is horrifying.
Maybe it meant that they married guys just like their daddies…
Hopefully.
WTF?????
Seems to me that the writing style suggests that the book itself was written by a young child, whose current understanding of the world is “When little girls grow up, they turn into mommies who are married to daddies” or whatever.
That is the only way that I can make sense of this tragedy.
I thought a young child wrote that, too. But according to the other comments, this is a real published book written for children?!
Forget the English fail!
The book fails!
Especially if it’s a book for children.
I would rather have the entire page covered with incorrect spelling/grammar than have it be an incestuous bedtime story. Poor Ellen…
Especially if it’s a book for children?Like if it’s a book for adults it would be O.K?
Lol….I’m just giving you a bad time:)
This book is still giving me the heebie jeebies tho…NOTlol.
*shakes head*
freudian fail
That deserves a strong, hearty, “What the FUCK?”
This is even more messed up than “The End”
This is no *english* fail. Post it a failblog, not englishfailblog!
It is an English fail. They spell daddies and “daddys”. The fact that it is in a disturbing sentence has no change on its grammatical errors.
the *english* fail there is just not funny.
*English* fails are IMO not funny, unless they give totally new meaning to the including text.
*facepalm*
maybe this book is used to teach kids about childhood psychology and this is the elektra complex page?
That was my thought. Although thinking that the one page is out of context doesn’t make it any less “ewwww”.
At first, I was shocked at the idea of this being in a children’s book; then I realized that this is probably from a work of confrontational art. This would not seem out-of-place in an art gallery; and as art which addresses gender-roles, this is brilliant. I believe more research into the source of this image is needed as I think it has been taken out of context.
Does anyone know where this is from? Is it some twisted 1950s storybook, or is it somebody’s more recent idea of “art”?
8qI’ll thingk about it.8b I compleatly disagree with last post . wkt
паркетная доска 1w
How is babby formed?
How girl get pragnent?