Thanks to Anna for:
0 
10 
6190 0 4570 0 4130 0 2530 0 2320 0 1610 3 1520 3 1370 1 1150 0 1060 2 950 1 760 1 740 0 680 2 650 2 620 2 610 0 631 0 570 2 54
What’s the big problem here? It’s a bit engrishy, but nothing spectacular. It refers to Macaca assamensis (common name: Assam macaque), named for where it was originally discovered, the Assam section of eastern India.
Aside from the missing t in “forest,” and some other minor typos, I really don’t see anything overly objectionable.
Have you noticed how critical and cantankerous everyone is getting here?
Wait, it refers to George Allen?
this seems like a report a third or fourth grader would make… not good grounds for a legit English fail.
I don’t think it’s a school project, though. It looks like one of those information boards they have outside the animal enclosures at zoos.
The sign is WRONG several times over; therefore it is a FAIL. I am tired of people trying to quantify the posts. Just enjoy the craziness that’s out there.
Yes, but it dilutes the whole when some postings are weak, as this one is.
Because we should totally make sure the internet is a pure place, full of material that betters our lives in ways we could never achieve outside of it.
Your logic is akin to a genocide mentality.
I wonder where this is – they’ve used the UK version of “colour” but the US version of “gray” (that is, aside from the obvious errors. And that strange capital T in the middle of the second paragraph …)
L