I noticed that on Facebook, too. I sent a comment about the grammatical error and they changed it the next day. So you have to give them credit for listening to feedback.
Also, the first sentence of the second paragraph is incorrect, besides the obviously wrong usage of “with”, instead of “without”. There is no need for the definitive article in there. It should read “No profile is complete with (sic) fantastic tattoo images like this.”, or else “No profile is complete with (sic) these fantastic tattoo images.” I’m sure there are quite a few other ways, but those two seemed the most obvious to me.
Actually, I agree with this. Your Facebook profile is likely less complete with this crap than without.
Wow, truthful advertising?
I think the point is the “with” should be “without”, guys.
No kidding justme. The first two resposes are sarcastic.
That should read: “…responses”
I noticed that on Facebook, too. I sent a comment about the grammatical error and they changed it the next day. So you have to give them credit for listening to feedback.
It is the valuable answer
Also, the first sentence of the second paragraph is incorrect, besides the obviously wrong usage of “with”, instead of “without”. There is no need for the definitive article in there. It should read “No profile is complete with (sic) fantastic tattoo images like this.”, or else “No profile is complete with (sic) these fantastic tattoo images.” I’m sure there are quite a few other ways, but those two seemed the most obvious to me.