Submitted by Brandi
1 
8 
6460 0 4300 0 2710 0 2380 0 1700 3 1621 3 1460 1 1210 0 1090 2 960 1 770 1 760 2 710 0 691 2 641 0 662 0 650 2 610 0 630 2 55
Actually, I agree with this. Your Facebook profile is likely less complete with this crap than without.
Wow, truthful advertising?
I think the point is the “with” should be “without”, guys.
No kidding justme. The first two resposes are sarcastic.
That should read: “…responses”
I noticed that on Facebook, too. I sent a comment about the grammatical error and they changed it the next day. So you have to give them credit for listening to feedback.
It is the valuable answer
Also, the first sentence of the second paragraph is incorrect, besides the obviously wrong usage of “with”, instead of “without”. There is no need for the definitive article in there. It should read “No profile is complete with (sic) fantastic tattoo images like this.”, or else “No profile is complete with (sic) these fantastic tattoo images.” I’m sure there are quite a few other ways, but those two seemed the most obvious to me.
Concise and well written, appreciate the data. Do you care if I post a number of this on my site if I incorporate a mention of the this site?
Thank you for one other good write-up. Wherever else could anyone have that kind of details in this type of a ideal way of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and Im to the look for this kind of information and facts.
Aw, this was a really nice post. In concept I wish to put in writing like this moreover ñ taking time and precise effort to make a very good articleÖ however what can I sayÖ I procrastinate alot and in no way appear to get one thing done.