Perhaps the person who wrote this was under the influence of a “relevant thing”
Submitted by Vee
Home
> Uncategorized > Perhaps the person who wrote this was under the influence of a “relevant thing”
FacebookHighest Rated
- A genuine inconvenience this sign is…
(4.93 out of 5) - Perhaps the person who wrote this was under the influence of a “relevant thing”
(4.87 out of 5) - Hotel Fail
(4.85 out of 5) - Pumpkinfest Fail
(4.84 out of 5) - Dear our guests, we appreciate all your pleasure…
(4.81 out of 5) - Restaurant Sign Fail
(4.81 out of 5) - This gives me a lot of faith in their abilities… Writing Center FAIL
(4.8 out of 5) - Roadwork Fail
(4.8 out of 5) - How many trucks do I get? FAIL
(4.76 out of 5) - Soda Fail
(4.75 out of 5)
hmmm maybe the reporter was playing ‘fill in the blanks’ and forgot to fill them with the actual “relevant thing”…. lol
This is simply amazing. I’m at a loss. I bow to its greatness.
Utensil is pretty funny too. I love this. Does this mean I need to remove the spork from my purse? Is it a relevant utensil?
If you don’t believe it and want to see it for real, go here:
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/millions-of-ecstacy-tablets-a-day-pill-presses-seized-20091030-hpv3.html
This is beautiful and so very very amusing.
I doubt he got those legally. Stronger thing control will not help control crime.
I think the reporter was accurate as far as the article goes, but wrote an incomplete description of the charges.
I expect there is an offence in Queensland of “possessing things used for the manufacture of dangerous or illicit drugs without a licence” or similar words.
Stronger thing control must be a good thing!
Any Queensland lawyers out there?
lol its funi,possess,possess and possess