Home > Uncategorized > Perhaps the person who wrote this was under the influence of a “relevant thing”

Perhaps the person who wrote this was under the influence of a “relevant thing”

November 1st, 2009 Leave a comment Go to comments

Submitted by Vee

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Mixx
  1. Beckles
    November 1st, 2009 at 16:03 | #1

    hmmm maybe the reporter was playing ‘fill in the blanks’ and forgot to fill them with the actual “relevant thing”…. lol

  2. Metalnoir
    November 2nd, 2009 at 10:13 | #2

    This is simply amazing. I’m at a loss. I bow to its greatness.

  3. wildmustard
    November 2nd, 2009 at 10:50 | #3

    Utensil is pretty funny too. I love this. Does this mean I need to remove the spork from my purse? Is it a relevant utensil?

  4. Ryan
    November 2nd, 2009 at 15:36 | #4
  5. ana
    November 10th, 2009 at 13:33 | #5

    This is beautiful and so very very amusing.

  6. Joe
    November 10th, 2009 at 15:28 | #6

    I doubt he got those legally. Stronger thing control will not help control crime.

  7. Roger
    November 13th, 2009 at 09:50 | #7

    I think the reporter was accurate as far as the article goes, but wrote an incomplete description of the charges.
    I expect there is an offence in Queensland of “possessing things used for the manufacture of dangerous or illicit drugs without a licence” or similar words.
    Stronger thing control must be a good thing!
    Any Queensland lawyers out there?

  8. ken
    January 7th, 2010 at 04:07 | #8

    lol its funi,possess,possess and possess

  9. Jason Farmer
    March 24th, 2010 at 14:43 | #9

    Yup, its the law!

    http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca191482/s3.html

    “thing relevant to an indictable offence” means:

    (a) either of the following:

    (i) anything with respect to which an indictable offence against any law of the Commonwealth or of a Territory has been committed or is suspected, on reasonable grounds, to have been committed;

    (ii) anything with respect to which a State offence that has a federal aspect, and that is an indictable offence against the law of that State, has been committed or is suspected, on reasonable grounds, to have been committed; or

    (b) anything as to which there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that it will afford evidence as to the commission of any such offence; or

    (c) anything as to which there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that it is intended to be used for the purpose of committing any such offence.

    “thing relevant to a summary offence” means:

    (a) either of the following:

    (i) anything with respect to which a summary offence against any law of the Commonwealth or of a Territory has been committed or is suspected, on reasonable grounds, to have been committed;

    (ii) anything with respect to which a State offence that has a federal aspect, and that is a summary or simple offence against the law of that State, has been committed or is suspected, on reasonable grounds, to have been committed; or

    (b) anything as to which there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that it will afford evidence as to the commission of any such offence; or

    (c) anything as to which there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that it is intended to be used for the purpose of committing any such offence.

  10. kram888
    April 25th, 2010 at 20:03 | #10

    that gives me alot of info what does “things” stand for ……..

  11. July 6th, 2010 at 12:01 | #12

    thank you its funy

  12. July 8th, 2010 at 07:58 | #13

    that gives me alot of info what does “things” stand for ……..

  1. No trackbacks yet.